During a contentious Tuesday hearing on her nomination by Donald Trump to serve as a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) commissioner, Senate Democrats hammered Danielle Thumann about recent actions taken by the Brendan Carr-led regulator that have been criticized as hostile to press freedom.Thumann, who serves as senior counsel to Carr, is expected to be approved as commissioner, with Republicans in charge of the US Senate and House. But Ben Ray LujĂĄn, a senator of New Mexico, assured her that the commissionâs actions will be under close scrutiny when Democrats take charge of the chamber in January.LujĂĄn asked Thumann repeatedly whether she agrees with actions taken by Carrâs FCC, including a nearly unprecedented order in late April forcing ABC to apply early to renew its local station licenses, a move that immediately followed criticism of one of the networkâs biggest stars, late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, by the president and Melania Trump, the first lady.
Carr was also accused of pressuring ABC affiliates to drop Kimmelâs show the previous fall.âDo you support Chairman Carrâs illegal campaign to remove Jimmy Kimmel from the nationâs airways?â LujĂĄn asked.âI have not worked with the chairman on any media-related issues, and Iâm not familiar with all of the details regarding the investigation of ABC or the early license renewal of their licenses,â Thumann responded. âAnd I havenât been involved in any of those conversations regarding any of their practices or regarding Jimmy Kimmel.âLujĂĄn pressed Thumann to name an issue she has disagreed with Carr on, and she demurred. He also asked her whether it was âappropriate for the FCC to call up Disneyâs broadcast license for early renewalâ.Several of LujĂĄnâs Democratic colleagues also took turns pressuring Thumann on the FCCâs actions toward television networks, with Ed Markey, the Massachusetts senator, grilling her on âChairman Carrâs FCC censorship agendaâ. âMs Thumann, does the FCC have the authority to punish a broadcaster because the president disagrees with its news coverage?âPushing back on her response, Markey said: âAgain, this should be a straightforward constitutional limitation, because the FCC cannot punish a broadcaster simply because the president doesnât like his coverage.
Yet Chairman Carr, your boss right now, has threatened to do exactly that.âMarkey accused her of choosing to âevadeâ his questions, saying that âanyone seeking a seat on the Federal Communications Commission must be willing to stand up to such threats and to defend the first amendment, and you are not willing to do so here in your confirmation hearing.âSenator Tammy Duckworth also asked Thumann about whether she would yield to political pressure to punish disfavored networks. While Thumann said the commission has to deal with complaints against networks it regulates, she acknowledged that âeditorial decision-making is protected by the first amendment for broadcastersâ, and added: âI donât think that a decision [about a stationâs license] should be based purely on someoneâs discontent with the content thatâs being aired.âSeveral Senate Democrats said it was inappropriate for the commerce committee to hold the confirmation hearing, and that if Republicans were going to nominate another member of the party to the commission, they should follow past precedent and nominate a Democrat as well.
The FCC currently has one commissioner nominated by a Democratic president, Anna M Gomez, but her term has already technically expired.At the end of the hearing, LujĂĄn issued a warning to Carr. âMr Carr, if youâre listening now, know youâre going to be in this body once a month, if not more, and in the House of Representatives as well, answering questions, and you donât have the protection of the gavel any longer,â he said. âSubpoena authorities that you have to respond to so we can get to the bottom of the nonsense and the cover-ups that have been taking place.â

